Reviewing manuscripts is voluntary and no formal compensation is given. The reviewers of the manuscripts submitted to the Journals published by the “STRATI” must have Ph. D. The reviewers should review the Paper in due time, maximum two weeks are permitted and must provide helpful suggestions and comments for the Author(s) and the Editor(s). The flat statements by the reviewers should be avoided.
Reviewers are eligible for the Journal(s) Editor’s letter of recommendation when you are evaluated for promotion, tenure or post-tenure review of tenured faculty at your college/university/institute.
Reviewers should use the following format for ranking of the manuscripts.
Reviewer’s Ranking Table
| Sr. No. | Issue reviewed | Score |
| 1 | Significant problems addressed | |
| 2 | Abstract up to the mark | |
| 3 | Introduction relevant and based on literature soundness | |
| 4 | Objectives clarified and relevant | |
| 5 | Review of literature attempted and added to the existing literature | |
| 6 | Writing style relevant and reader friendly | |
| 7 | Conceptual and theoretical soundness | |
| 8 | Sound and appropriate analysis | |
| 9 | Conclusion, logical, crisp and focused | |
| 10 | Policy relevance, contemporary and useful |
Note: Scoring from 1 to 5 (1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree, 4=strongly disagree, 5=n/a – not applicable)
Manuscript Number:
Manuscript title:
Reviewer’s comments and recommendations:
Accepted/Minor revision needed/major revision needed/rejected:
Reviewer’s identity: